DCHS Insights CX Human-Centered Design @ DCHS PROTOTYPE no real data With service integration
Counts, timings, and emotion scores are illustrative assumptions, not workshop measurements. Days refer to first stable service, not the whole journey; service access does not mean every long-term goal is secured.
Janice Brown
Housing insecurity and fragmented services complicate one mother's efforts to find stability and reunite with her children.
Who they are
Janice Brown, 38, is a single mother of four whose children are currently in kinship care. Unhoused after leaving a violent home, she lives in a safe house and is unemployed, with prior experience in retail customer service. Safety, housing, food and benefits, behavioral health, work, and reunification need attention together. She draws strength from her love for her children and support from kinship and family caregivers. She wants a stable job, a safe home with her children, and opportunities for them to attend college. Janice continues seeking help despite exhausting application and appointment processes. Caring workers and small signs of progress give her hope, but repeated storytelling, colliding appointments, and separate plans make that progress difficult to sustain. Housing remains an important part of planning for reunification.
In their words
I already told somebody this.
I can do the appointments. I cannot do them all at once.
If housing is the thing everything depends on, why is it the last thing moving?
What they are good at
- Protective parent who acted under pressure
- Persists through lengthy applications and repeated appointments
- Clear about what she can and cannot manage
- Prior retail customer-service experience
- Support from kinship and family caregivers
What they are carrying
- Safety after leaving a violent home
- Housing that affects reunification
- Food, benefits, and behavioral health needs arriving at the same time
- Four children in kinship care while she works toward reunification
- Unemployment and the need for work that fits around services and family needs
What they hope for
- A safe place that does not expire before the next step is ready
- To stop narrating the worst night to new strangers
- Reunification that is not blocked by invisible dependencies
- A stable job and a safe home with her children
- Opportunities for her children to attend college
What they would never volunteer
- Details of domestic violence in a lobby or to someone who cannot explain why they need it
- Overlapping appointments and program deadlines can make attendance impossible even when she is actively trying to comply
- How close she is to giving up on separate plans
Business as usual
The current experience across six stages, including its human cost and the indignities created along the way.
crisis and separation
safety first
the story again
separate clocks
hope needs continuity
planning beyond the safe house
A CPS hotline report and domestic-violence crisis bring Janice into services. Her children enter kinship care, court and custody changes begin, and she receives a DV referral.
A safe house, safety assessment, and emergency support. DV and child-welfare workers are assigned, but Janice struggles to understand separate processes and when she can see her children.
Referrals reach a housing locator, economic support, behavioral health, and the Workforce Development Center (WDC). Separate workers ask her to repeat the story; caring individuals offer moments of trust.
Benefits applications, a WDC case manager, and support services begin moving. Documentation issues, delays, and separate schedules still leave Janice managing conflicting appointments.
DV and behavioral-health services, parenting support, and progress tracking create signs of improvement. Janice feels hopeful about reunification, but guilt, family needs, and separate plans leave progress vulnerable to setbacks.
DV and case-management exit planning and community referrals begin. Stable housing, work, and continuing support are still needed to sustain progress toward reunification.
CPS hotline / court / DV referral
Safe house / DV and child-welfare workers
Housing / benefits / behavioral health / WDC
Program offices
DV / behavioral health / parenting support
Exit planning / housing / community referrals
Limited money and legal support during a family crisis
Support is present; the next steps are hard to connect
9 retellings across 7 doors
Conflicting appointments and forms
She still carries the connections between separate plans
47 days to first stable service; longer-term goals remain open
Business as usual vs Integrated
How coordinated service delivery changes the same six-stage experience while keeping unresolved constraints visible.
crisis and separation
safety first
the story again
separate clocks
hope needs continuity
planning beyond the safe house
A CPS hotline report and domestic-violence crisis bring Janice into services. Her children enter kinship care, court and custody changes begin, and she receives a DV referral.
A safe house, safety assessment, and emergency support. DV and child-welfare workers are assigned, but Janice struggles to understand separate processes and when she can see her children.
Referrals reach a housing locator, economic support, behavioral health, and the Workforce Development Center (WDC). Separate workers ask her to repeat the story; caring individuals offer moments of trust.
Benefits applications, a WDC case manager, and support services begin moving. Documentation issues, delays, and separate schedules still leave Janice managing conflicting appointments.
DV and behavioral-health services, parenting support, and progress tracking create signs of improvement. Janice feels hopeful about reunification, but guilt, family needs, and separate plans leave progress vulnerable to setbacks.
DV and case-management exit planning and community referrals begin. Stable housing, work, and continuing support are still needed to sustain progress toward reunification.
The same crisis and child-welfare process require urgent safety action. Workers coordinate the first safe contact and explain what happens next; detailed screening waits until she is ready.
Safety and stabilization still come first. When she is ready, workers arrange one consent-based intake for shareable information and explain the next steps together.
Warm handoffs connect housing, benefits, behavioral health, WDC, and child welfare around one plan. With consent, shareable facts travel so each referral does not restart the story.
The same services are coordinated: workers reuse permitted documentation and sequence benefits, workforce, treatment, and parenting appointments around each other.
Workers connect existing progress tracking in one consented view, coordinate parenting and treatment support, and follow up after a missed appointment before considering closure.
Housing is prioritized within a coordinated transition plan linking work, child welfare, and community support. Handoffs have owners and follow-up; housing and reunification still require continued work.
Removed 1
Remaining 1
Removed 1
Remaining 1
Removed 3
Remaining 0
noneRemoved 2
Remaining 0
noneRemoved 0
noneRemaining 2
Removed 0
noneRemaining 2
Shift
Limited money and legal support during a family crisis -> Safety and a clear next step before detailed screening
Shift
Support is present; the next steps are hard to connect -> A paced intake and one explanation of the next steps
Shift
9 retellings across 7 doors -> One shared account; required program questions remain
Shift
Conflicting appointments and forms -> Fewer collisions, fewer forms
Shift
She still carries the connections between separate plans -> Setbacks prompt outreach and a coordinated response
Shift
47 days to first stable service; longer-term goals remain open -> 6 days to first stable service; needs met 7 of 8
Fragmented touchpoints
Each service can do its own work while the person is left to carry the thread between them.
Where the thread drops
Coordinated service path
Shared context and explicit handoffs reduce the work required of the person without hiding constraints the system cannot remove.